Abstract
Introduction. The immunomodulatory functions of platelets in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) have been scarcely investigated although they showed pro- or anti-inflammatory properties depending on the clinical setting, notably in autoimmune diseases. In ITP, T cell dysregulation is clearly established with a pro-inflammatory Th1/Th17 polarization and a decrease in the anti-inflammatory response mediated by regulatory T cells. To determine the potential effects of platelets on the CD4 T cell response, we performed platelet phenotyping and assessed their effect in vitro during coculture with CD4 T cells.
Methods. The platelet phenotype of ITP patients (n=38) was compared according to disease activity (platelets <30 G/L, n=13, or platelets between 30-100 G/L, n=25) with that of healthy subjects (n=13). The expression of different markers was measured by flow cytometry to assess activation (CD62P, PAC-1), degranulation (CD63), antigenic presentation (HLA-DR), expression of costimulatory (CD40, CD40L, CD80, CD86) and inhibitory molecules (PDL1, GARP/TGF-β). The impact of platelets on CD4 T cells was determined by measuring their proliferation upon stimulation (CD3/CD28 microbeads) with or without platelets (25 platelets/1 lymphocyte). The phenotyping of CD4 T cell included the expression of activation markers (CD25), inhibitory molecules (CTLA-4, GARP/TGF-β), polarization (Th1/IFN-γ, Th2/IL-4, Th17/IL-17) and the induction of regulatory T cells (CD4+CD25HiFoxp3+).
Results. The median age of ITP patients was 57 [Q1-Q3:40-74] years with a median platelet count of 41 [25-70] G/L. The female/male sex ratio was 1.9. ITP was considered primary in 92%, 3 patients also presenting antiphospholipid syndrome, Grave disease or Sjogren disease. ITP was newly-diagnosed in 37%, persistent in 13% and chronic in 50% cases.
While the proportion of platelets expressing CD62P was similar between controls and patients, the frequency of platelets binding to PAC-1, i.e. with an activated conformation of GPIIb/IIIa, was higher in ITP patients (2.3% [1.7-3.5] vs. 0.8% [0.6-1.4], p<0.0001), and even higher in patients with platelet count <30 G/L (3.0% [2.3-4.1]). The frequency of degranulated platelets assessed by CD63 expression was increased in ITP patients (1.1% [0.7-1.9] vs. 0.4% [0.3-0.7], p<0.0001). The proportions of platelets expressing HLA-DR and costimulatory molecules such as CD40, CD40L, CD80 and CD86 were also higher in ITP as compared to controls (1.4% [0.9-2.8] vs. 0.4% [0.2-1.5], p=0.003; 0.8% [0.4-1.4] vs. 0.2% [0.2-0.5], p=0.0009; 1.9 [0.9-3.6] vs. 0.2 [0.1-0.2], p<0.0001; 3.1% [1.3-4.7] vs. 0.7% [0.6-1.0], p=0.005; 1.6% [1.0-2.9] vs. 0.4% [0.2-0.9], p=0.0008, respectively). The number of platelets expressing the inhibitory molecules PDL1, TGF-β or its anchoring protein GARP, was higher in ITP than in controls (1.2% [0.8-2.5] vs. 0.6% [0.5-1.1], p=0.005; 1.5% [0.9-2.0] vs. 0.6 [0.4-1.1], p=0.0001; 1.1% [0.8-1.7] vs. 0.6% [0.5-0.9], p=0.0007, respectively).
Coculture of CD4 T cells with platelets led to an inhibition of their proliferation, that was higher in ITP than in controls (66.6% [53.2-77.3] vs. 47.4% [28.6-55.6], p=0.01). There was also an induction of Th17 cells in presence of platelets (1.9% [1.2-2.4] to 3.3% [2.0-4.6], p=0.01), while Th1 and Th2 percentages remained stable. Platelets also promoted the expression of inhibitory molecules by CD4 T cells, such as TGF-β (0.9% [0.7-1.2] to 3.9% [2.9-5.7], p=0.002) and CTLA-4 (3.9% [2-6] to 9.2% [6.6-24.1], p=0.001). Finally, platelets induced regulatory T cell differentiation (2.4% [1.1-4.0] to 7.7% [4.6-12.0], p=0.002).
Conclusion. The proportions of activated platelets, together with platelets expressing pro- and anti-inflammatory markers are increased in ITP. In vitro, platelets promote a Th17 skewing. However, this is associated with increased expression of the inhibitory molecules CTLA-4 and TGF-β by CD4 T cells, as well as increased differentiation toward regulatory T cells, arguing for a global inhibitory effect, as supported by the inhibition of CD4 T cell proliferation. Given the reduced platelet count in ITP, this effect is most probably abrogated, suggesting that low platelet count might contribute to the pro-inflammatory CD4 T cell response in ITP. On the other hand, normalization of platelet count upon therapies might directly participate to remission by restoring immune tolerance.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal